Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 12:01:51 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Local_unbound and (opn)vpn Message-ID: <20200504120151.d82a5a04.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20200504104935.c3106837a6582028853b623f@sohara.org> References: <20200504054312.GA73151@mithril.foucry.net> <20200504080728.GC73151@mithril.foucry.net> <20200504104935.c3106837a6582028853b623f@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 May 2020 10:49:35 +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2020 10:07:28 +0200 > Jacques Foucry <jacques+freebsd@foucry.net> wrote: > > > Well forgot my question. The solution was in this mail :-) > > > > I was thinking duriong writing but not testing before sending it. > > Doing this in person is a powerful debugging technique known as > 'cardboard man debugging' because the person having the problem explained > to feels like they could have been a cardboard cutout. If I remember correctly, the modern terminology for this kind of action is "rubberducking". It's also available as a web-based cloud-hosted ML VR SaaS, of course... ;-) Sidenote: When you're able to explain something, no matter if to a real person or a bardboard cutout, a rubber duck or your cat, you have proven that you actually understand what you're dealing with. Requesting explanations is also a good method to filter for "knowledge actors" (impostors who think their expensive suit, their shiny certificate or their gorgeous job title can compensate their lack of knowledge). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200504120151.d82a5a04.freebsd>