Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:54:57 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Cc: geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: g_part partition tool -- some logistic questions Message-ID: <17224.1171144497@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:23:32 PST." <5BB89CF0-69CE-4A93-828B-298A13CD0F67@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <5BB89CF0-69CE-4A93-828B-298A13CD0F67@mac.com>, Marcel Moolenaar wri tes: >I'm writing a partitioning tool, I'm working on the >geom that's being partitioned. In an ideal world all >partitioning schemes are handled by g_part, which >means I can look for the g_part class and have them >all, but for now I need to hardcode the numerous >classes. If you're working from the XML, consider having the classes announce themselves to you in XML ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17224.1171144497>