Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 17:24:46 -0800 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>, Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what to do now ? Was: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_icmp.c tcp_subr.c tcp_var.h Message-ID: <200012200124.RAA17477@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: <20001219191929.D40568@skriver.dk> References: <20001218182600.C1856@skriver.dk> <200012191425.GAA14731@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> <20001219191929.D40568@skriver.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Dec 19, 7:19pm, Jesper Skriver wrote: } Subject: Re: what to do now ? Was: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_icmp.c } } I'll submit a new later tonight, as I havn't heard anything, I'll make a } sysctl control if it should have effect on all sessions, or only those } in SYN-SENT state, defaulting to those in SYN-SENT state only. Do all ICMP unreachables kill off sessions in in the SYN-SENT state or only the administratively prohibited flavor? If all of them do, then only administratively prohibited ICMP unreachables should kill off established connections so that established sessions aren't killed off by routing flaps and other transient events. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012200124.RAA17477>