Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:36:03 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" <speedtoys.racing@gmail.com> To: "Juha Saarinen" <juhasaarinen@gmail.com> Cc: Robert Fitzpatrick <lists@webtent.net>, FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Dual core processors Message-ID: <a969fbd10611141836s49ad5d7sfdc2c567eb1ee982@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <b34be8420611141831x2cebfb3ey4238d31952025222@mail.gmail.com> References: <1163545085.492.20.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <8cb6106e0611141504sa4fbe00q8aeda6f869422d26@mail.gmail.com> <1163548016.492.26.camel@columbus.webtent.org> <b34be8420611141602n657e83fah6f965a3d9ddf600@mail.gmail.com> <a969fbd10611141613n1f0c562emcae8a279fe38bc68@mail.gmail.com> <b34be8420611141630o3f78c6aj7e689ffebaf68bcf@mail.gmail.com> <a969fbd10611141822r2da4c58eqdf92d2a2e1199681@mail.gmail.com> <b34be8420611141831x2cebfb3ey4238d31952025222@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is a stock kernel config the 'fast' way to go on these CPUs? Sure wish there was an 'options I_WANNA_GO_FAST' or an 'options RICKY_BOBBY' that would just do all the right things. Still not sure which scheduler to go with.. On 11/14/06, Juha Saarinen <juhasaarinen@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/15/06, Jeff Mohler <speedtoys.racing@gmail.com> wrote: > > I thought that since we both had HTT tags in the CPU ID, that we had it. > > Yeah, well... that's a funny thing that tag. Got it on my > first-generation 1.3GHz Pentium 4 as well. Makes me wonder if Intel > had that feature in the processors very early on, but only enabled it > in the later cores. > > -- > Juha > http://www.geekzone.co.nz/juha >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a969fbd10611141836s49ad5d7sfdc2c567eb1ee982>