Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:32:13 +0300 From: "John Smith" <almarrie@gmail.com> To: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD Message-ID: <499c70c0611260832m448702e8yaf660e73c08da0de@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420611260418h70415e4buc807f001e9b0c9da@mail.gmail.com> References: <499c70c0611260212sa53a2bcq6345f063b7bfdddf@mail.gmail.com> <cb5206420611260418h70415e4buc807f001e9b0c9da@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 11/26/06, John Smith <almarrie@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? > > The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless > you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and > maybe take active maintainership of it. > > You can try it just for the fun of it, but your problem reports > will be met by a grinning "we told you so". > Thank you Andrew, I'm asking because I downloaded PC-BSD 1.3 Beta which is based on FreeBSD 6.1 and the default in kernel is ULE, so I wanted to make sure. Regards, -J
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?499c70c0611260832m448702e8yaf660e73c08da0de>