Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:51:33 -0700 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: FreeBSD-alpha mailing list <freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: test results for Lynx (AS2100A) Message-ID: <200007182151.OAA19240@mass.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2000 15:03:57 EDT." <14708.43258.138626.9497@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It would be very cool if you could try to boot NetBSD on your 2100A & > see what happens. > > >From what I know of how the interrupt routing works on the 2100, the > irqs we're seeing are impossible. So they may have changed it on the > 2100A. From the time I spent reading the Sable/Lynx code in the Linux tree, the two principal differences were the base address for 'interesting' register space, and the interrupt layout. I'd be fairly certain that things are different on the 2100A. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007182151.OAA19240>