Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:06:35 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMART Message-ID: <4AFC166B.1040502@andric.com> In-Reply-To: <hdh2ub$n7$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20091112103308.GA2536@hiMolde.no> <20091112115350.GA18542@icarus.home.lan> <hdguqv$isj$1@ger.gmane.org> <288A7D7F-C247-4493-8ED1-E67FFC3E0201@exscape.org> <hdh0l7$ocv$1@ger.gmane.org> <20091112133221.00006b43@unknown> <hdh2ub$n7$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2009-11-12 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote: > I've seen it. But I don't remember if they addressed the problem of > nonstandard interpretations of statistics? Note the statistics you quoted are "Vendor Specific SMART Attributes", so it is quite logical for different vendors to have different statistics. :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AFC166B.1040502>