Date: 19 Mar 2005 10:31:00 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Max recursion level (500) exceeded. Message-ID: <44k6o3y7nv.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <423BA1EC.9020806@FreeBSD.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0503181929500.13080-100000@pancho> <423BA1EC.9020806@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >
> >> The problem lies in the gcc32 port. It redefines USE_GCC. It, and
> >> the other gcc ports, need not to do that.
> > IIRC gcc3.2 had a USE_GCC definition that its internal make stuff
> > needed whose existance predated the creation of bsd.gcc.mk which
> > introduced a USE_GCC variable intended to be used internal to the
> > ports framework which has different semantics. AFAIK gcc32 has
> > been broken since that time.
> > I do not have time to test this hypothesis but would suggest trying
> > a patchset with s/USE_GCC/INTERNAL_USE_GCC/ or something.
> > It would be great if someone could investigate and fix this problem
> > ...
>
> Here is a simple solution.
> First of all, OOo needs to remove the gcc32 BUILD_DEPENDS, and replace
> it with USE_GCC=3.2.
That's got to be the right thing anyway.
> Then, for each gcc port, simply replace the USE_GCC=2.7+ line with
> .undef USE_GCC
It still leaves the problem of needing at least gcc 2.7 to bootstrap,
but I suppose marking it broken for OSVERSION before 400012 is
reasonable at this date.
> If people want to test this, I'll commit it.
Sure; the GCC part works. I haven't retested the OpenOffice build;
that's a bit too unwieldy for me to do at the moment. I'll get to it
by early next week, if no one else does.
Be well.
Lowell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44k6o3y7nv.fsf>