Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:41:04 +0100
From:      Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm Makefile
Message-ID:  <20040304084104.GE23759@droso.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040304083023.GF20689@toxic.magnesium.net>
References:  <200403040801.i2481HWd038215@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040304081809.GC20689@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040304082237.GB23759@droso.net> <20040304082500.GE20689@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040304082727.GC23759@droso.net> <20040304083023.GF20689@toxic.magnesium.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 03:30:23AM -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >> (03.04.2004 @ 0327 PST): Erwin Lansing said, in 2.1K: <<
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 03:25:00AM -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Please back this out. ion-devel was a repocopy for Edwin, who nev=
er did
> > > > > anything with it. AFAIK ion-devel is still identical to ion. I'm =
working
> > > > > on an ion2 PR.
> > > > >=20
> > > > Actually, your commit to modules broke sanity checks. You should al=
so
> > > > fix that:
> > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/CVSROOT-ports/modules.diff?r1=
=3D1.9566&r2=3D1.9567&f=3Dh
> > >=20
> > > Hrmmn... I was hoping just to make ion-devel's path more accessible. I
> > > can back that out easily enough.
> >=20
> > On second thought, I'll add a comment to Makefile and comment out
> > ion-devel so it is clear why it isn't hooked up to the build.
> >> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm Makefile" from Erwin Lansing <<
>=20
> Heh. I just backed ion-devel out of modules. I ain't adding it back in.
> You're welcome to though ::P
>=20
> In fact...... maybe we should just remove ion-devel altogether. ion2
> will be the next version, and it's not a development branch. It's
> unnecessary to have this thing sitting in the tree gathering dust.
>=20
I agree, this should just disappear. Edwin has no objection, so I'll
just remove the port. I guess we also want cvsmeisters to remove the
files, right?

-erwin

--=20
                    _._     _,-'""`-._
Erwin Lansing      (,-.`._,'(       |\`-/|    erwin@lansing.dk
http://droso.org       `-.-' \ )-`( , o o)    erwin@FreeBSD.org
                    -bf-      `-    \`_`"'-

--XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFARuugqy9aWxUlaZARAnoaAJ41JC7FJ1tG13+RAV27X8EbYuk4QwCg1R/5
n7gk1Eo7y/ve8PXF90dpwj0=
=Amby
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040304084104.GE23759>