Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:01:20 +0200 From: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? Message-ID: <CA%2BD9QhsyOh34SghWzQPpnTig%2BUmSEO2VP7jfPxTXs9zW9Uakeg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211644350.3170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <CAPj0R5Kmi-%2BdJ7mPvTrTAoS8O983svOyR2WyK2_v1Cr07dSS_A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211413140.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhuQ%2BbxKW9%2BdX%2BzS9mErwz8JSkV2G7qL0KfB8BH_LGJAgA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211539230.2903@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhvR_eKtVxdKcaMyOS7tLw_AOHKgUy3o7mJn2b=chMA0Xw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211619250.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhvwKZm7heoe7tpfhYCJvkknw_HC7aFjCu%2B-1xYQBmV6ng@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211644350.3170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Wojciech Puchar < wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > >>> >>> interesting idea but the options ZFS would give you are superior to this >> setup. >> > > Were you just unable to understand my setup or a reasons to do this? > > please reread former post and possibly ask again if you don't understand > the reasons. > > I ignore performance issues completely for now. I do understand your setup but I dont have too agree that it is a good solution. I know you think it's the best and only one :) > > > But I have still not seen any evidence/facts that ZFS looses more >> data than UFS. >> > > And you've never seen me, yet i still exist. > Really? that's you anwser to my question. The most childish answer I could image. You have a gift to troll and ruine every topic with this kind of answers....
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BD9QhsyOh34SghWzQPpnTig%2BUmSEO2VP7jfPxTXs9zW9Uakeg>