Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:07:27 +0800 From: wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>, Wen Heping <wen@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/eog-plugins Makefile ports/graphics/shotwell Makefile ports/graphics/ethumb Makefile ports/multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile ports/multimedia/mlt Makefile ports/net/mediatomb Makefile ports/net/minidlna Makefile ports/sysut Message-ID: <AANLkTikFv2uNxB%2BTnJY3Sj0XttaXHLcD_qTscwQ9kTc9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110304100917.GA56262@FreeBSD.org> References: <AANLkTimDsgsj7syPJw18C67TkqZZ8=QqoTyGpma=Shjq@mail.gmail.com> <69590488@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20110304100917.GA56262@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/3/4 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:55:19AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:37:25 +0800 wen heping wrote: >> > 2011/3/4 Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>: >> > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 02:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Wen Heping wrote: >> > > >> > >> =C2=A0Modified files: >> > >> =C2=A0 graphics/eog-plugins Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 graphics/shotwell =C2=A0Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 graphics/ethumb =C2=A0 Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 multimedia/mlt =C2=A0 =C2=A0Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 net/mediatomb =C2=A0 =C2=A0Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 net/minidlna =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 sysutils/tracker-client Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 www/swiggle =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 x11-fm/gnome-commander2 Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 x11-fm/nautilus =C2=A0 Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 x11-fm/thunar =C2=A0 =C2=A0Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0 x11-toolkits/nucleo Makefile >> > >> =C2=A0Log: >> > >> =C2=A0- Bump PORTREVISION to chase the update of libexif >> > > >> > > Was it necessary to bump those and other PORTREVISIONS? So >> > > far I was sure that PORTREVISION bumps are necessary as soon >> >> > In porter's handbook: >> > Examples of when PORTREVISION should be bumped: >> > .... >> > Changes in the packing list or the install-time behavior of the >> > package (e.g. change to a script which generates initial data for the >> > package, like ssh host keys). >> > ..... >> > This update changed plist. > > I don't think so. =C2=A0Update of *graphics/libexif* changed *that port's= * plist > (added bunch of new translations), but shlib version was not bumped (it's > a minor update), so PORTREVISIONs of the *dependent* ports should had bee= n > left intact. =C2=A0Your mentor should have told you this. :-) miwi has the same opinion as you here. > > Now you've essentially urged lots of people around the world to rebuild > their perfectly fine packages (considering that libexif is fairly common > dependency). Also libexif.12.so did not change the shlib version, I knew from upstream this is a security update , so I think there should be something changed in the shlib. I think it is safe and worthy to force all the user rebuild t= heir package which depend on libexif. wen > > ./danfe > --=20 =E7=9C=9F=E7=90=86=E4=BB=8E=E6=9D=A5=E6=B2=A1=E6=9C=89=E6=88=98=E8=83=9C=E8= =BF=87=E8=B0=AC=E8=AF=AF=EF=BC=8C=E7=9C=9F=E7=90=86=E5=8F=AA=E6=9C=89=E5=9C= =A8=E5=9D=9A=E6=8C=81=E8=B0=AC=E8=AF=AF=E7=9A=84=E4=BA=BA=E6=AD=BB=E5=8E=BB= =E5=90=8E=E6=89=8D=E6=88=90=E4=B8=BA=E7=9C=9F=E7=90=86=E3=80=82
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikFv2uNxB%2BTnJY3Sj0XttaXHLcD_qTscwQ9kTc9>