Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 18:20:05 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238724] textproc/asciidoc 8.6.10 requires python 2.7 in spite of make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=python=3.7 Message-ID: <bug-238724-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238724 Bug ID: 238724 Summary: textproc/asciidoc 8.6.10 requires python 2.7 in spite of make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpython=3D3.7 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: powerpc OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org Reporter: dclarke@blastwave.org CC: powerpc@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(sunpoet@FreeBSD.org) CC: powerpc@FreeBSD.org Assignee: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org The title seems clear but what I see is that building textproc/asciidoc ver 8.6.10 seems to have this in the Makefile :=20 USES=3D autoreconf gmake gnome python:2.7 shebangfix However in /etc/make.conf we clearly have : hydra# cat /etc/make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dpython=3D3.7 DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dssl=3Dopenssl111 DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dperl5=3D5.28 hydra#=20 This seems to be respected on x86_64 thus :=20 vesta# uname -a=20 FreeBSD vesta 12.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p4 GENERIC amd64 vesta#=20 Wherein pkg query shows that python 3.7 seems to be fine as a dep : vesta# pkg query %t\ %n\ %v\ %o | sort -n . . . 1560322345 gsed 4.7 textproc/gsed 1560322531 python37 3.7.3_1 lang/python37 1560322685 p5-Error 0.17027 lang/p5-Error 1560322764 bash 5.0.7 shells/bash 1560322847 getopt 1.1.6 misc/getopt 1560322962 libxml2 2.9.8 textproc/libxml2 1560323293 libgpg-error 1.36 security/libgpg-error 1560323321 libgcrypt 1.8.4_1 security/libgcrypt 1560323333 libxslt 1.1.32 textproc/libxslt 1560323441 xmlcatmgr 2.2_2 textproc/xmlcatmgr 1560323447 iso8879 1986_3 textproc/iso8879 1560323448 docbook-sgml 4.5_1 textproc/docbook-sgml 1560323454 xmlcharent 0.3_2 textproc/xmlcharent 1560323455 docbook-xml 5.0_3 textproc/docbook-xml 1560323457 sdocbook-xml 1.1_2,2 textproc/sdocbook-xml 1560323458 docbook 1.5 textproc/docbook 1560323462 docbook-xsl 1.79.1_1,1 textproc/docbook-xsl 1560323468 libpaper 1.1.24.4 print/libpaper 1560323502 libltdl 2.4.6 devel/libltdl 1560323515 libatomic_ops 7.6.10 devel/libatomic_ops 1560323529 boehm-gc 8.0.4 devel/boehm-gc 1560323557 w3m 0.5.3.20190422 www/w3m 1560330207 xmlto 0.0.28 textproc/xmlto 1560330226 asciidoc 8.6.10_1 textproc/asciidoc 1560330305 pcre2 10.32_1 devel/pcre2 1560330313 cvsps 2.1_2 devel/cvsps 1560330385 git 2.21.0 devel/git 1560330395 wget 1.20.3 ftp/wget . . . Note that at no time was python 2.7 dragged in.=20 However on ppc64 we seem to be force fed python 2.7. Feels wrong to me.=20 Is there some hard reason why python 3.7.3 does not do all that we need for asciidoc?? ps: yes I know this is seen on PPC64 and a lot of work is=20 going on there but the architecture should be of no concern. see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233863 --=20 Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-238724-7788>