Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:47:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Pritchard <mpp@mpp.pro-ns.net> To: kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au (Kris Kennaway) Cc: jesus.monroy@usa.net (Jesus Monroy), doc@freebsd.org, advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Survey: online documentation 15% incorrect Message-ID: <199906240747.CAA15702@mpp.pro-ns.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9906241704070.21553-100000@bragg> from Kris Kennaway at "Jun 24, 1999 05:05:09 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Mike Pritchard wrote: > > One interesting problem your survery points out is that whatis/makewhatis > > get confused about inetd.conf and inetd. It lists them both as section > > 5 man pages, when only inetd is section 8. This is because > > the inetd Makefile MLINKS inetd.8 to inetd.conf.5. There are > > probably a few other commands that might be doing this. I'll have > > to look at this closer. > > Wasn't this just fixed in the past few days? I remember a commit message > citing rpc.statd as an example. Or maybe I don't. That was whereis, not whatis. It was a fix to prevent it from stripping the suffix off of commands like rpc.statd. Two different problems. -- Mike Pritchard mpp@FreeBSD.ORG or mpp@mpp.pro-ns.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906240747.CAA15702>