Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 17:24:03 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r365725 - head/lang/gcc5 Message-ID: <20140825172403.7ea565bc@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1408251456030.3274@tuna.site> References: <201408231231.s7NCVa2w094830@svn.freebsd.org> <20140825144800.15a65f42@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1408251456030.3274@tuna.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:15:08 +0200 (CEST) Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > Wouldn't it be better to move the port to lang/gcc50? Presumably > > the tools will also be gcc50, g++50 etc. right? > > No. :-) > > GCC changed the versioning scheme similar to FreeBSD: the next > major releases after GCC 4.8 and GCC 4.9 are going to be GCC 5, > GCC 6, GCC 7, and so forth. > > Accordingly I am planning to call the tools gcc5, g++5, gfortran5, > and gcj5, respectively (and documented this in lang/gcc5/pkg-descr). > Otherwise, we'd be changing that for bugfix releases. > > Does that make sense? Yes :) So what would have been 5.0.1 will now be 5.1 and the old 5.1 becomes 6.0.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140825172403.7ea565bc>