Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:23:48 +0100 From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Journaled filesystem in CURRENT Message-ID: <E17uwy4-0007Zy-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <3D935E2B.6F50B1DB@mindspring.com> References: <200209251319.g8PDJYoD047918@ib.com.ua> <20020925111232.B3686@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020926111949.5c0da160.Alexander@Leidinger.net> <20020926090325.A24614@zardoc.esmtp.org> <3D93459B.E4405568@mindspring.com> <20020926113551.A11092@zardoc.esmtp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> wrote: >Claus Assmann wrote: >[ ... out of order answer, not related to main topic ... ] >> "Per domain" doesn't work easily if you have multiple recipients. >> Anyway, the new design clearly distinguishes between the content >> files and the data that is necessary for delivery. > >Actually, it works fine, since it performs queue entry splitting, >in the case of multiple recipients. That yields a 100% hit rate >for per domain queue traversals, since they contain only messages >destined for the domain in question. But back to JFS... Exim doesn't do per-domain queue runs; when it successfully delivers mail to a host it checks its hints database for any queued mail that can go to the same place and shoves them down the same connection -- no scanning of multiple files involved. Tony (exim bigot). -- f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ ROCKALL: SOUTHWEST BACKING SOUTH 3 OR 4, OCCASIONALLY 5 IN NORTH. MAINLY FAIR. MODERATE OR GOOD. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E17uwy4-0007Zy-00>