Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 12:24:18 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: Niclas Zeising <zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se> Cc: Kenta Suzumoto <kentas@hush.com>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The vim port needs a refresh Message-ID: <CADLo838TYb_AZmVAfmSDLBh6JstUgr=3Z=Y9EnA6kXVgBx1k=Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51A09858.4060803@daemonic.se> References: <20130524212318.B967FE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> <CADLo83_AgAH0fARvtoYYmw5UEf7%2B3nEEs6U%2B6%2BhY8r0MbTkWFw@mail.gmail.com> <51A09858.4060803@daemonic.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 May 2013 11:54, Niclas Zeising <zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se> wrote: > On 05/25/13 10:50, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> Alternatively, perhaps we need an editors/vim-options port???? > > Just for the record, editors/vim was (and shells/bash) was converted to > optionsNG not too long ago. Ah, that's at least some good news. I notice that it was on yet another maintainer timeout, so that criticism stands. It appears that David is no longer interested. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838TYb_AZmVAfmSDLBh6JstUgr=3Z=Y9EnA6kXVgBx1k=Q>