Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:09:58 +0100
From:      "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org>
To:        David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: boot failed with gzip'ed modules
Message-ID:  <481523E6.5010909@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200804261840.52978.naylor.b.david@gmail.com>
References:  <200804252320.39121.naylor.b.david@gmail.com>	<200804260822.47763.jhb@freebsd.org> <200804261840.52978.naylor.b.david@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Naylor wrote:
> Is there any plan to add bzip2 to loader (i.e. bzip2 modules and kernel) or to 
> geom_uzip?  If not is there a good reason why it is avoided or just a case of 
> lacking developer interest (or time)?  
>   
bzip2 uses a block-sorting compression algorithm, which requires 
significantly larger amounts of memory to operate than gzip, which uses 
a dictionary-based compression algorithm.

As such, gzip is more appropriate for use in boot-time and/or embedded 
environments, which often have limited heap space.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?481523E6.5010909>