Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:58:27 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Removing an alias can remove routes ? Message-ID: <1a2f60f2-6f78-00d6-9287-eaf3408205fa@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <CAMXt9NZ=rMOToi8nSU8YQjb0WAXbbuMamdS6Uy82v4j9YoPkMw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAMXt9NZ=rMOToi8nSU8YQjb0WAXbbuMamdS6Uy82v4j9YoPkMw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
14.01.2019 23:29, Mark Saad wrote: > So I wanted to remove the alias ended in 163 and fix its netmask back to /32 And this was right desision. > I ran this > > ifconfig lagg0.vlan1044 inet 10.24.213.163/24 -alias && ifconfig > lagg0.vlan1044 inet 10.24.213.163/32 -alias > > and shortly there after all of the routes that went out lagg0.vlan1044 > were gone . I quickly undid my change and put the routes back but I am > not sure what caused this ? Anyone have any ideas I have done this in > the past with out issue and I am unsure whats changed other then the > box have a long up time of 463 days . Wrong original netmask of an alias was a reason of this. You should use /32 only for aliases. Re-add all aliases with /32 then re-add routes and you will be fine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1a2f60f2-6f78-00d6-9287-eaf3408205fa>