Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:09:11 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The Source Code Control System Message-ID: <3D093427.550ADE1@mindspring.com> References: <1467.1023969804@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> <3D08AA50.EBF82917@mindspring.com> <20020613191816.GA44881@gits.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > > That's a bit misleading. The sccs utility is clearly marked as an XSI > > > extension. > > > > Just like mmap(). 8-) 8-). > > ls and ps are better examples since mmap is a syscall while the others > are command line utilities :P http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/help/codes.html#XSI If an entire SYNOPSIS section is shaded and marked XSI, all the functionality described in that reference page is an extension. See XSI Conformance . http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/utilities/ls.html Not all "ls" functionaluty is an extension. All mmap functionality is: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/mmap.html -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D093427.550ADE1>