Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:53:50 +0200 From: Frank Steinborn <steinex@nognu.de> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Do we need a few more ports reviewers/committers? Message-ID: <20060512105350.F3C91B81E@shodan.nognu.de> In-Reply-To: <69557175@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <20060509004620.3a8ed7a1@serene.no-ip.org> <20060512035553.GB27663@soaustin.net> <51637568@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <44645A12.3040207@FreeBSD.org> <69557175@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Samorodov wrote: > > But you wrong here. maintainer-update means "Update from Maintainer" but > > you're not yet. So the right class would be change-request. > > Are you sure? Porters handbook Chapter 10 Upgrading: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/port-upgrading.html > ----- > The best way to send us the diff is by including it via send-pr(1) > (category ports). If you are volunteering to maintain the port, be > sure to put [maintainer update] at the beginning of your synopsis line > and set the ``Class'' of your PR to maintainer-update. Otherwise, the > ``Class'' of your PR should be change-request. > ----- > > Did I misunderstood something? If you *are* the maintainer of the port use [maintainer update], otherwise you should consider sending your patch to the maintainer directly or use at least [change-request]. Frank
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060512105350.F3C91B81E>