Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Jul 2007 20:57:42 +0200
From:      "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com>
To:        "Wojciech Puchar" <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Cc:        Nguyen Tam Chinh <unixvn@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files
Message-ID:  <b41c75520707011157w40b24a1buaad2d3e9dc40b6eb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070701203449.F64116@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References:  <64b284310706270311j2a6af2f6i6766b483a4b66a5c@mail.gmail.com> <b41c75520707010030u25497199p1ce6b91bd1f5287c@mail.gmail.com> <20070701203449.F64116@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> > Try zfs on amd64 unless your app doesn't work well with zfs or your
>
> does zfs have RELIABLE and USABLE software allowing to efficiently backup
> large filesystems to other media? (DVD's, tapes, other hard discs)

Zfs has send/receive where you can do snapshots and send them to a
different host. This could be your backup-host. I'm considering this
solution myself where FreeBSD and zfs is my primary host and my
nightly backups will be send to my solaris-host. Solaris has the
required lto-3-drivers.

-- 
regards
Claus

When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.

Shakespeare



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520707011157w40b24a1buaad2d3e9dc40b6eb>