Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:38:13 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> To: gavin@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd.20.skel@spamgourmet.org Subject: Re: bin/116477: rm(1): rm behaves unexpectedly when using -r and relative paths Message-ID: <20080628113326.Y89027@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200806271353.m5RDrSHq036920@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200806271353.m5RDrSHq036920@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 gavin@freebsd.org wrote: > So, it looks like Solaris now behaves in the same way FreeBSD does in this > case, which (along with bde@'s analysis) suggests to me that the current > behaviour is correct. > > Submitter: do you still believe this to be incorrect, or can I close the PR? Didn't I analyze that something needs to be done (since POSIX requires slightly different behaviour)? POSIX is tightening up the wording for symlinks. There was some discussion closely related points on the POSIX mailing list not long after the PR was submitted. IIRC, POSIX generally agrees with the FreeBSD interpretation that a trailing slash causes symlinks to be followed, and might need to change the wording in places that say otherwise. I forget the details and haven't checked for changes in documents. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080628113326.Y89027>