Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:06:36 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP multi processor compilations for everyone Message-ID: <1237921596.44701.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <gqb7kf$2mon$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> References: <1237901632.1849.19.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <gqb7kf$2mon$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-GONPvW5SZXwTLWfYrtjw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Christian Weisgerber p=ED=B9e v =FAt 24. 03. 2009 v 18:09 +0000:
> > If you are FreeBSD port maintainer:
> >=20
> > Nothing changes for you, if you don't want. If you want to enable the
> > use of multiple cores in your port, add MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=3Dyes to a block
> > somewhere below dependency declarations.
>=20
> What is the goal here? Should all ports that can be safely built
> in parallel eventually have MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=3Dyes? =20
Ideally yes.
> Or should we not
> bother with ports where the gain is likely to be minimal?
That would be sensible.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
As to floating eyes, let them float :). - r.g.r.a
--=-GONPvW5SZXwTLWfYrtjw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAknJLzgACgkQntdYP8FOsoIi7ACdHgDcSow4Dh0ObZ8FwU7HU4je
468An272dgfW8LnnMfFvfpKrcKjjcb26
=Wk4z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-GONPvW5SZXwTLWfYrtjw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1237921596.44701.1.camel>