Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:54:12 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Jeremy Lea <reg@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r190182 - head Message-ID: <9bbcef730903201554x773f46bdy890c8ab48760dce2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090320221211.GA5205@flint.openpave.org> References: <200903202151.n2KLpRMB014702@svn.freebsd.org> <20090320221211.GA5205@flint.openpave.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/3/20 Jeremy Lea <reg@freebsd.org>: > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 09:51:27PM +0000, Ivan Voras wrote: >> +20090320: >> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 GEOM_PART has become the default partition slicer for st= orage devices, >> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 replacing GEOM_MBR, GEOM_BSD, GEOM_PC98 and GEOM_GPT sli= cers. It >> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 introduces some changes: the devices created from MSDOS = extended >> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 partition entries (EBR) can be named differently than wi= th GEOM_MBR >> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 and are now symlinks to devices with offset-based names,= and kernel >> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 dumps are now not allowed to be written to devices whose= partition >> + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 types indicate they are meant to be used for file system= s. >> + > > This should probably also note the issue with stale disklabels from old > DD mode disks, which causes the machine to be unbootable. =C2=A0It should > also mention the "geometry does not match label (255h,63s !=3D 16h,63s)" > message (which appears to be harmless), and it should also probably > mention that the c partition now covers the entire disk, not just the > "DOS partition"... =C2=A0And it should be noted that these changes took p= lace > in Decemeber, so that people have a better chance of knowing if they are > going to be bitten. Ok. Should I re-sort the note into December (probably not since it mentions development from a large period) or just mention it in text? @Marcel: is the warning important (I didn't encounter it yet; I guess it probably a quirk of UFS?) and is the "c" change intended? (isn't it time to abandon the special case of "c"?)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9bbcef730903201554x773f46bdy890c8ab48760dce2>