Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 12:50:15 +0200 From: Stefan Miklosovic <miklosovic.freebsd@gmail.com> To: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Adam PAPAI <wooh@wooh.hu> Subject: Re: sysbench / fileio - Linux vs. FreeBSD Message-ID: <AANLkTimofNc03PNO8MA0aNtpUEElaiD81kzp08AN5Tj4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201006050236.17697.bruce@cran.org.uk> References: <4C09932B.6040808@wooh.hu> <201006050236.17697.bruce@cran.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> /var : ufs with softupdates > /usr/obj : zfs with checksums disabled > /usr/src : zfs with compression enabled > /home : zfs with compression disabled and checksums enabled > > I ran a test with a blocksize of 8KB and 16 threads. > > /var : 25.2MB/s > /usr/obj : 64.8MB/s > /usr/src : 386.3MB/s > /home : 60.3MB/s Do I understand it well? It seems that zfs with compression enabled on /usr/src with 8KB block size and 16 threads performs 386.3MB/s which is about 6 times better than debian5? I am thinking about this image http://tech-blog.wooh.hu/~wooh/debian_vs_freebsd_io_16_seqwr.png what is your system specs?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimofNc03PNO8MA0aNtpUEElaiD81kzp08AN5Tj4>