Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 02:58:53 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should jail treat ip-number? Message-ID: <19991110025853X.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <24337.942169052@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <19991110022852N.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> <24337.942169052@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm not against adding IPv6 functionality to jail(2), my point is > merely that until somebody who has sufficient time & ability to > fiddle with it does it, it's not going to happen. > > The usual rule applies: > > "Great idea, why don't you send me patches which does this ?" OK, then I'll try making patches and send you. My current Idea is that adding a new member, a pointer to sockaddr to the jail structure, and leave current ip_number member for backward compatibility. (Also with associated changes in kernel and the jail command) Yoshinobu Inoue To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991110025853X.shin>