Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Jan 2013 02:47:41 -0500 (EST)
From:      doug@safeport.com
To:        Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: pkg_add and 9.1 Release
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301020246050.87494@oceanpt.safeport.com>
Resent-Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301020258490.87528@oceanpt.safeport.com>
In-Reply-To: <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301020018230.42551@fledge.watson.org> <50E3DAB0.9020001@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Matthew Seaman wrote:

> On 02/01/2013 05:20, doug wrote:
>> Is this command being phased out? pkg_add -r uses a default environment
>> of
>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/
>
> In fact, yes, pkg_add and the other pkg_tools commands are being phased
> out in favour of pkgng.  However it is early days yet, and the problem
> you're seeing has nothing to do with that process.  pkgng won't become
> the default in 9.x until the next release: until then the status quo
> ante persists.
>
>> This path does not exist on ftp.freebsd.org.
>
> Quite so.  It's because of this:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html
>
> As a consequence, large parts of the package building infrastructure are
> quarantined, pending reinstallation.  Also there is a lot of work going
> into revising the software used to build the packages with security
> enhancements in mind.  So there simply aren't packages available yet to
> go with 9.1-RELEASE.

Ah yes, thank you Matthew. I had forgotten about that. I guess the 9.1RC3 
packages were removed for the same reason.


_____
Douglas Denault
http://www.safeport.com
doug@safeport.com
Voice: 301-217-9220
   Fax: 301-217-9277




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1301020246050.87494>