Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 10:04:14 +0200 (MEST) From: hans@artcom.de (Hans Huebner) To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Does this deserve send-pr? Message-ID: <m0ySGzO-00000wC@mail.artcom.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980422175116.1988C-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug White writes: >On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Jason C. Wells wrote: >> I did this stupid thing by accident. I did it a second time just to make >> sure. :) >> # mount_cd9660 /dev/wcd0c /dev >> I got, "panic ufs_lock resursive lock not expected pid 158," for my >> efforts. >> Should this be a problem report? I ask here first because I have two >> problem reports come back to me as non-problem reports. >No, that's pilot error. :) phk would swat that PR in an instant. I strongly disagree. If there is a way to sanity check the arguments, they should be checked. I agree that pilots need to know what they do, but crashing the machine because of a pilot error should be avoided if possible. -Hans To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0ySGzO-00000wC>