Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 23:23:04 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>, <ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ports.conf Message-ID: <20010824231632.G1542-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20010824113242.B1095@zerogravity.kawo2.rwth-aachen.d>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Alexander Langer wrote: > So, are you ok with: > - share/mk/sys.mk only sucking in /defaults/make.conf and /etc/make.conf > - bsd.port.mk sucking in $PORTSDIR/Mk/ports.conf and then overwriteable > in /etc/ports.conf? I am, for the new stuff at least. sys.mk still sucks in /etc/defaults/make.conf.local (historical cruft). It shouldn't suck in /etc/defaults/make.conf because the latter shouldn't set anything. It currently only sets BDECFLAGS. /etc/defaults/make.conf is unlike all the other files in /etc/defaults. It [should] only gives examples. The actual defaults are in /usr/share/mk/sys.mk. Perhaps /etc/defaults/make.conf should be named make.conf.examples and put elsewhere (where?). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010824231632.G1542-100000>