Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:51:45 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: misc/9033 
Message-ID:  <199812140251.SAA18602@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
    Uh, I really, really, really doubt that anybody bothers with 
    that specification, especially considering that I've never even
    heard of it before.  'UNIX' in the sense of AT&T's original
    trademark is 20 years out of date, anyway.  Nobody in their
    right mind tries to adhere to somthing that old.

						-Matt

:
:Matt Dillon wrote:
:
:> it
:> isn't really a bug in UNIX.  Most UNIX's have include file dependancies 
:
:UNIX(tm), as specified in the Single Unix Specification, version 2, 
:doesn't have include file dependecies. See ...../xsh/compilation.html.
:
:Dima
:
:
:

    Matthew Dillon  Engineering, HiWay Technologies, Inc. & BEST Internet 
                    Communications & God knows what else.
    <dillon@backplane.com> (Please include original email in any response)    

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812140251.SAA18602>