Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:40:03 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl> To: Glenn Sieb <ges@wingfoot.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading a 5.1-RELEASE-p10 system... Message-ID: <20041020094003.GA834@alex.lan> In-Reply-To: <4175CA60.1060907@wingfoot.org> References: <417579FB.6090805@wingfoot.org> <20041019213837.GB822@alex.lan> <41758B49.8040205@wingfoot.org> <20041020010116.GC822@alex.lan> <4175CA60.1060907@wingfoot.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 10:16:00PM -0400, Glenn Sieb wrote: > Alex de Kruijff said the following on 10/19/2004 9:01 PM: > > >Gerely speeking, STABLE doesn't mean things never gets broken. Most > >reliable are the RELEASE plus fixes. So don't follow 5-STABLE but > >5-RELENG > > > > > To help ease frustration and such.. you mean: > > Follow RELENG_5_2 not RELENG_5 (from: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html) Yes, thats what I mean. I didn't check the tags so I didn't get them rigth. Even following RELENG_5_X doesn't mean things never gets broken. The xl nic driver was broken in RELEASE_4_5 which meant I coudn't use the net. :'( So its also a good idee to save a working source (/usr/src) before updating to a new release. (But there's no gurantee you can downgrade, i think) I never had any trouble with the other releases. Its just a case of bad luck. > In cvsup-supfile speak for those of us using cvsup to sync our source trees Those of us who updates there source usaly use cvs. -- Alex Please copy the original recipients, otherwise I may not read your reply. WWW: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041020094003.GA834>