Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 10:33:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should cam_imask be part of bio_imask ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990828103147.446R-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199908281712.KAA04963@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Isn't all the work in CAM done at splsoftcam? (or am I thinking of old code) It starts off an ISR similar to the netisr doesn't it? On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I'm trying to track down some VFS/BIO corruption on an NFS server > being tested under heavy loads and noticed that my SCSI interrupts > do not appear to be blocked by splbio(). > > (The adaptec's are on irq 5 and irq 12) > > (kgdb) print bio_imask > $1 = 0x40080040 > (kgdb) print cam_imask > $2 = 0x400c1020 > (kgdb) > > This doesn't sound right to me. > > -Matt > Matthew Dillon > <dillon@backplane.com> > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.990828103147.446R-100000>