Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 14:54:02 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, Joe Abley <jabley@patho.gen.nz>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Message-ID: <20000313145402.B11429@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <200003122012.PAA00812@etinc.com>; from dennis@etinc.com on Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:44:04AM -0500 References: <20000312083736.A27614@patho.gen.nz> <200003101840.NAA12885@etinc.com> <Pine.BSF.4.05.10003111306520.14049-100000@bsd1.nyct.net> <200003111841.NAA17534@etinc.com> <20000312083736.A27614@patho.gen.nz> <20000312193205.W68308@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <200003122012.PAA00812@etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:44:04AM -0500, Dennis wrote: > > "slowly" is the key word here. Real products are documented before > they are in commercial use. The fact that they're documented, does not imply that their documentation is also "good", though. Oh, and let us not forget that some vendors think their documentation of the system is not an essential 'part' of the whole thing, but it should come packaged in a separate bundle, and charged extra. - Giorgos Keramidas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000313145402.B11429>