Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 21:28:47 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>, John Hay <jhay@mikom.csir.co.za> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 in -current Message-ID: <19981101212847.14447@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811010922160.306-100000@picnic.mat.net>; from Chuck Robey on Sun, Nov 01, 1998 at 09:37:41AM -0500 References: <199811010922.LAA05107@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811010922160.306-100000@picnic.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 01, 1998 at 09:37:41AM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > On Sun, 1 Nov 1998, John Hay wrote: > Would it be a reasonable thing to ask, that there be held an electronic > debate? It need not be broadcast realtime ... the idea being that each > team of developers be given the clearest possible chance to put forward > their ideas in a sort of a debate-type encounter. This could be done > via email to a 3rd party, a moderator, who would accumulate the results. > If it was done via email, then (although it would be slower) it would > not turn on momentary mistakes in phrasing so much as ability to present > themselves; such a dialog could take up to a week or more to actually > accumulate some presentable weight. This kind of debate is what I would like to see in freebsd-arch (with its new status as moderated but open to subscription by anybody). I don't think a moderated but open discussion would be a problem; I hope all of us (including the developers of each of the stacks) want to get an as good as possible result for FreeBSD, not just a result in the favour of ones 'original horse'. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981101212847.14447>