Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 14:38:22 -0800 (PST) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> To: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: phk@critter.tfs.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW (was: Re: -stable hangs at boot) Message-ID: <199602262238.OAA14871@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199602261926.MAA00360@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Feb 26, 96 12:26:22 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
... > > Nate: 3) The code -stable is un-documented and incomplete w/regard to > > Nate: -current. The documentation in -stable hasn't been updated yet. Here > > Nate: is the last entry for the ipfw.8 man-page. > > > > Reality has overtaken you again. A couple of hours ago I committed a almost > > complete synopsis and description to the man page. > > Glad to hear it, but it happened after I sup'd the CVS tree. It also > appears that you need to add the patch you just made to -current into > -stable as well. Don't you just hate having to keep two trees in sync > sometimes? (Though the advantages outweigh the disadvantages). That is why I raised the little protest the other day, this should have all been done in -current, stabalized, tested, hashed out, etc, then and ONLY then should have it been brought over to -stable. As it stands now I have ``Frozen'' my stable sources until this work is done, which means I can not take advantage of several other nice fixes that just recently went in to -stable :-( :-(. Work should really be done in one branch only until it is _complete_. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602262238.OAA14871>