Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:57:26 -0500 From: Jim C <jconner@enterit.com> To: Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: truss Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20000224105609.00a66548@mail.enterit.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0002241707530.25545-100000@sun262.hai.iec.co .il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
er -- um...I hope my last post was actually to a question and not a reply (RE: truss). If it was please excuse the former email I just sent and go about your merry days as if it never occurred....please? =>. Jim At 17.09 24.02.00 +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote: >I miss the -f functionality in freebsd truss.. > > -f Follow all children created by fork() or > vfork() and include their signals, faults, > and system calls in the trace output. Nor- > mally, only the first-level command or pro- > cess is traced. When -f is specified, the > process-id is included with each line of > trace output to indicate which process exe- > cuted the system call or received the signal. > > >--Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant >[ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ] > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.20000224105609.00a66548>