Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:56:31 -0800
From:      "pete wright" <nomadlogic@gmail.com>
To:        "Eugene Grosbein" <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org, performance@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: benchmark
Message-ID:  <57d710000701050956j36433495v72b62a9404a25a5d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070105174350.GA21615@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
References:  <20070105174350.GA21615@svzserv.kemerovo.su>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/5/07, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to meashure network throughput between two 6.2-PRERELEASE boxes,
> basically get maximim IP packets per second transmitted/received.
>
> Tried to use iperf from ports in UDP mode with 64 byte payload,
> but it calls gettimeofday() after each write and gives me about 80Kpps only
> for Pentium D 2.8Ghz.
>
> What alternative should I use? May be, a netgraph node?
>

I've done some benchmarking/testing of 10gig-e NIC's using a combo of
iperf/netgraph and ttcp with good results.  all are available in
ports.

-pete


-- 
~~o0OO0o~~
Pete Wright
www.nycbug.org
NYC's *BSD User Group



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57d710000701050956j36433495v72b62a9404a25a5d>