Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1998 00:54:50 +0300 From: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I almost hate to suggest this... Message-ID: <199812192154.AAA00405@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 19 Dec 1998 13:18:16 %2B0100." <36644.914069896@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In difference from Bruce I think that mount_XXX is the primary interface, > (and as such agree with jordan that mount_ufs should be there). Mount > is just a backwards compatibility gadget now. Most mount_XXX programs are somewhat broken if used as user interface. Mount(8) is the only way to mount filesystems from /etc/fstab, anyhow. I think, primary user interface is mount(8) combined with $EDITOR /etc/fstab (unless we are talking about fixit floppy, of course). Dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812192154.AAA00405>