Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 15:43:39 +0200 From: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jbq@caraldi.com> To: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Successfully building ekiga Message-ID: <20060404134338.GT28452@vision.anyware> In-Reply-To: <op.s7hj48mg9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <20060403094743.GH19483@vision.anyware> <20060403152212.GA22840@energistic.com> <20060404105502.GL28452@vision.anyware> <op.s7hd4mgf9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20060404130245.GM28452@vision.anyware> <op.s7hj48mg9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jeremy Messenger: > On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:02:46 -0500, Jean-Baptiste Quenot > <jbq@caraldi.com> wrote: > > > > If we want to maintain gnomemeeting/ekiga, we would have > > > done it long time ago. ;-) > > > > Does it mean nobody is interested in ekiga? > > Correct, it seems. Maybe it's better to say that there are very > very a few, not nobody such as you are insteresting in. The interesting feature in Ekiga that GnomeMeeting did not have is support for the SIP protocol, that means you can use ekiga to make calls over asterisk. So I won't be the only person interested, because Open-Source PABX is a hot topic. > > If this is the case, shall I will keep the port private for > > me, myself and I? > > Why private? Why not maintain it by yourself in the open public? > bland has added a good reply. If you have no insterest to > maintain it, then it goes back to the same thing that we have no > insterest to maintain it either. This is a misunderstanding: I think ekiga belongs to Gnome, that's the point. Now, deciding who is the maintainer does not really matter. I don't feel embarrassed to maintain yet another port. Let's see what kwm thinks of it. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot aka John Banana Qwerty http://caraldi.com/jbq/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060404134338.GT28452>