Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:22:05 +0100
From:      Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        cpghost@cordula.ws
Subject:   Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice?
Message-ID:  <200501042122.21570.4711@chello.at>
In-Reply-To: <20050104200424.GB33185@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net>
References:  <20050103204341.GB26032@xor.obsecurity.org> <41DACF99.50601@taborandtashell.net> <20050104200424.GB33185@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 04 January 2005 21:04, cpghost@cordula.ws wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:17:13AM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote:
>
> I've tried to compile openoffice from scratch using the port (it worked
> before), but this time it bombed near the end with a program 'lzip'
> dumping core because it was fed a wrong package list (?). I tried to
> track the problem down, but it was too deeply hidden within the OO
> build process, so I finally gave up and fetched the binary package which
> works perfectly. This was 2 weeks ago; perhaps OO compiles perfectly now?

No on 5.3-STABLE it doesn't. See http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ there 
is a note from 2004/Dec/22 and there is also an open PR about this:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/75785

Cheers,
ch

- -- 
Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x3BCA53BE 
OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFB2vr909WjGjvKU74RAoVUAJ9ImwhvycswcAYDosDCXCbZJUS79wCeKf4j
RAytWInFjsyXQjjjivwRnLQ=
=KQ9H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501042122.21570.4711>