Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:16:14 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Justin Stanford <jus@security.za.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PR's foating in limbo for no apparent reason Message-ID: <20010319101614.D73138@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103191002520.54770-100000@athena.za.net>; from jus@security.za.net on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:03:42AM %2B0200 References: <20010319100101.C73138@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103191002520.54770-100000@athena.za.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:03:42AM +0200, Justin Stanford wrote: > I quote from the send-pr form: > > SEND-PR: Lines starting with `SEND-PR' will be removed automatically, as > SEND-PR: will all comments (text enclosed in `<' and `>'). > > Comments, are, afterall, comments - to be ignored by any automata. Is this > the case though, because if so it is unclear on the PR report form. Oops. Of course you're right. Hmm after looking at PR 25913 (which I left as 'pending' for someone more knowledgeable to examine - I'm not too familiar with GNATS to know if a state change can lose relevant information), I, too, am kind of stumped. I guess someone who knows how GNATS works should take a look. G'luck, Peter -- Hey, out there - is it *you* reading me, or is it someone else? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010319101614.D73138>