Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 03:29:22 +0900 From: ARIGA Seiji <say@sfc.wide.ad.jp> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: lconrad@Go2France.com, kris@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPsec Performance (Re: Merge of KAME code) Message-ID: <20000713032922M.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20000713022715E.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000711174522.03075a20@mail.Go2France.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007111506110.88886-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000713022715E.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:27:15 +0900, ARIGA Seiji <say@sfc.wide.ad.jp> wrote, : : > Has anybody benchmarked or simulated how many tunnels and bits/sec one : : > software-only FreeBSD IPsec server can support? : : My P120 can do about 2.5MBps :-) : I used to benchmarked IPsec performance on following platform with netperf. : - PentiumIII 500MHz : - 256MB Memory : - Intel Ether Express Pro 100 (100Mbps) : - FreeBSD 2.2.8 : - KAME 19990809 stable Ah, I told a lie, sorry. I used two clients and one router. client - router - client Above is a router spec. Client (IPsec machine) spec is, - PentiumII 450MHz - 128MB Memory - Intel Ether Express Pro 100 (100Mbps) - FreeBSD 2.2.8 - KAME 19990809 stable I used static IPsec configuration (No IKE). // ARIGA Seiji To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000713032922M.say>