Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:07:12 +0100
From:      Anthony Campbell <ac@acampbell.uk>
To:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Permissions problem for sane
Message-ID:  <20150812130712.GH29542@ithaca.acampbell.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508100954260.22775@wonkity.com>
References:  <20150806104335.GA27748@ithaca.acampbell.uk> <1876444.Yqz8SnZpVd@desk8.phess.net> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508061514330.24695@wonkity.com> <CAJ-Vmom%2BgG9b1imVzL9nx6HQmTSHr0n8WXg%2B7J7VksgAhHyO5g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1508100954260.22775@wonkity.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 Aug 2015, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> 
> >Why isn't this the default behaviour for the saned package? Would it
> >be possible to make it just be said default behaviour?
> 
> Running a network daemon rather than just changing permissions?  That's
> probably why.  Can't say what the problem is for the OP, but I know for a
> fact that it works with the permissions right.  My 1640SU has been in use
> for years that way.


Just to say that I finally got the permissions change to work. I hadn't
edited /etc/rc.conf to enable the ruleset in //etc/devfs.rules.


-- 
Anthony Campbell			http://www.acampbell.uk



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150812130712.GH29542>