Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Nov 2011 12:46:27 -0500
From:      Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 8.2-RELEASE-p4
Message-ID:  <CA%2BQLa9CGKU-NcH37ODpKt6JsdCxyiZ6vOQ_et4iOY0Z__os6gg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EBDA9C0.8010309@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <4EBD2CD8.2040209@charter.net> <4EBD4EA8.3000109@infracaninophile.co.uk> <CA%2BQLa9AH6QK_ZQVO20kKKGNk-5=qDodp5Tae-AY0Bme9qaTTCg@mail.gmail.com> <4EBDA9C0.8010309@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Matthew Seaman
<m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
> Now the updates for -p4 certainly should have touched the kernel, and
> certainly should have resulted in an updated uname string[*]. =A0There
> should also be a note about -p4 in /usr/src/UPDATING. =A0Starting to
> wonder if the -p4 patches are actually available via freebsd-update(8)
> -- could they have been omitted because it wasn't actually a security
> fix? =A0Odd that no one would have commented in a whole month if so.

I would suppose that you are right, but I'm not sure myself.  Does
anyone else know if p4 is available through freebsd-update?  It seems
like it should touch the kernel, but it definitely is not doing so.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BQLa9CGKU-NcH37ODpKt6JsdCxyiZ6vOQ_et4iOY0Z__os6gg>