Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 03:26:31 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: nate@root.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/acpi Makefile.inc Message-ID: <20040115031722.F2686@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20040114.172325.71181558.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <20040113130843.4702F16A54D@hub.freebsd.org> <20040113093817.E62202@root.org> <20040114.172325.71181558.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote: > In article <20040113093817.E62202@root.org> > Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes: > > > Is this the right approach? If you want a single Makefile.inc in > > /sys/modules, then why not just include ../../Makefile.inc? Why make an > > empty one that just includes its parent, which leads us to a twisty chain > > of Makefile.inc's, all the same? > > I think that this is a better and simpler way than adding > '.include ../../Makefile.inc' to all Makefiles in subdirectories. Right. The twisty maze in the modules subdir is the fault of the directory organizers. Modules should be in a flat hierarchy like they are when they are installed. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115031722.F2686>