Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 13:13:14 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ls(1) options affecting -l long format Message-ID: <50222.935406794@axl.noc.iafrica.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:36:00 %2B0200." <49041.935400960@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:36:00 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > If there are no objections (other than the obvious backward issue of > compatibility) in the next few days, I'll bring Chris's change in (with > a style fix), as well as teaching -o to imply -l. Eeek, I've been confused. Our -o and the OpenGroup spec's -o are completely different. :-) The -n option will imply -l, but -o will be a no-op unless at least one of -n and -l is specified. Manpage changes will be included in the deal. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50222.935406794>