Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:27:30 +0100 From: Antoine Jacoutot <ajacoutot@lphp.org> To: Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com>, FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. Message-ID: <200401141827.30569.ajacoutot@lphp.org> In-Reply-To: <20040114163043.GL415@seekingfire.com> References: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> <009201c3daad$31d89220$1100a8c0@dtg17> <20040114163043.GL415@seekingfire.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:30, Tillman Hodgson wrote: > I'm a heavy Zebra (migrating to Quagga) user. Using dynamic routing is > very handy, but it won't solve the problem of balancing load across two > connections. Thanks for the feedback :) > So you can't round-robin between two default gateways. You /can/, > however, send traffic for different destinations out of different links. > For example, I send my nightly CVSup traffic and other automated > downloads out of a regular ADSL link in order to prevent swamping my > main link. What I'm hoping to do is find a way to route all paquets coming: - from DMZ to internet, using NET connexion1 - from LAN to internet, using NET connection2 To be more understandable, something like this: route add from DMZ defaut em0 route add from LAN defaut em1 --> I know it is not a real command line, it's just to make things clearer. > If your upstream providers support dynamic routing protocols, then you > can get that destination information automatically. But that's not the > same as load balancing, it's best-path selection. And if it doesn't ? Anyway thanks a lot for answering. Regards, Antoine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401141827.30569.ajacoutot>