Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 11:13:39 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/emacs Makefile Message-ID: <20100522111339.GA49597@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <ygey6fcfdhl.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> References: <201005211951.o4LJp46e084250@repoman.freebsd.org> <yge1vd4h5zr.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <87bpc832m4.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20100522063751.GA87869@FreeBSD.org> <87y6fc1jxd.fsf@kobe.laptop> <ygezkzsfihm.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> <20100522084946.GA23161@FreeBSD.org> <ygey6fcfdhl.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 07:16:22PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Though I myself always build from ports and don't use packages, having > -nox11 package for emacs is good thing, IMHO. > I'm not sure how useful emacs with DBUS without X11 is. Actually, I'm > using emacs without both X11 and DBUS. How about disabling both, for > now? Disabling both makes even more sense than disabling any one of them, resulting in a lightweight package, which even I (who does not use package either) agree might be a good thing to have. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100522111339.GA49597>