Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:29:28 -0800 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: KES <kes-kes@yandex.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: Can not set up two ADSL link to provider Message-ID: <02520DA6-8B85-4E58-A358-BA313DD84133@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <14510195100.20090127212357@yandex.ru> References: <1292888884.20090127013434@yandex.ru> <79E49174-F6EC-4E97-AB7F-BCE05303A749@mac.com> <14510195100.20090127212357@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:23 AM, KES wrote: > CS> ...talks about "After you configure the LAG bundle, you can > route IP > CS> traffic over it, create a VLAN over it, or route PPPoE traffic > over it." > > I do not want to aggregate links. I want use them as standalone > I had two servers, two lans and two ADSLs. Now I have one server, four > NICs: first LAN1, second LAN2, third ADSL1, forth ADSL2 > I want to route LAN1 through ADSL1, LAN2 through ADSL2. LAN1/LAN2 must > not interact with each other. For each LAN I use its own FIB (routing > table). > Only one problem: I can not run setup two PPPoE link if for second > link is leased same gateway as for first > > So, is it possible to workaround this problem? Talk to your ISP. :-) I find it perhaps unusual that you would be in a circumstance which is well-suited for link aggregation and would gain from the higher bandwidth and redundancy advantages which it offers, but do not want to do so. Well, you know your circumstances best.... Regards, -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?02520DA6-8B85-4E58-A358-BA313DD84133>