Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 14:38:37 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tar hangs 2.2.x system Message-ID: <19970615143837.DG25350@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <339E86BE.7A59@cki.ipri.kiev.ua>; from Ruslan Shevchenko on Jun 11, 1997 14:06:25 %2B0300 References: <199706110614.BAA04741@dyson.iquest.net> <339E86BE.7A59@cki.ipri.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Ruslan Shevchenko wrote: > > tar -cvf /dev/rfd0 somefiles > > > > Note the "raw" device. > > > > But it is a bug. > > Anybody, do send_pr No, don't. For one, it was a known bug, so the PR wouldn't probably have caused more reason for anybody at all, and now, Bruce has fixed this bug a couple of days ago. Folks, nevertheless: Buffered devices (/dev/fd0) are JUST and ONLY for mounting something (and for swapon(8)). Raw devices (/dev/rfd0) are FOR EVERYTHING ELSE. (The terms `block device' and `character device' are misnomers you should never use. Historical errors.) Sorry for shouting, but from some non-newbie like dennis, i would have expected to know this. I'm repeating this over and over again to my clients on any Unix course i'm teaching. (There are several reasons for this statement, beyond the now fixed FreeBSD bug.) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970615143837.DG25350>